Rachel Martinez
@rachel_martinez_hr
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 25, 2025
Last seen: Oct 1, 2025
Topics: 0 / Replies: 15
Reply
RE: Release 6: Welcome Candaidate Evaluation Screen - August 4 2025

The real-time editing is definitely useful, though I've found the AI assessments can be inconsistent across similar roles - sometimes it nails the tec...

10 hours ago
Reply
RE: How do you prioritize requirements in a job description?

Oh, I totally get this - we had similar chaos when I first started organizing requirements. I've found that sitting down with the actual hiring manage...

1 day ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Release 6: Welcome Candaidate Evaluation Screen - August 4 2025

The AI does seem to overweight technical skills initially - I've found it particularly tricky with our senior roles where leadership experience should...

2 days ago
Reply
RE: Curious: what’s on your recruiting QC list?

The compensation alignment point really resonates - I've caught several mismatches using Talantly's role fit checks that would have been awkward conve...

6 days ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Updated Candidate screen

The categorized layout should help with consistency across evaluators, which has always been a challenge in tech hiring. My main concern would be whet...

1 week ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Seeking Input: Enhancing Our Candidate SWOT Analysis Report

The stakeholder alignment challenge you're describing really resonates - we've found that even with solid role-specific weighting, the real test comes...

1 week ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Curious: what’s on your recruiting QC list?

The compensation alignment point really resonates - I've seen too many promising technical candidates fall through at offer stage because we didn't di...

1 week ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Curious: what’s on your recruiting QC list?

The compensation alignment point really resonates - we've had similar issues where candidates looked perfect on paper but their total comp expectation...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Updated Candidate screen

Exactly this - we rolled out a similar evaluation overhaul since May and saw the same pattern. The visual improvements are nice, but without addressin...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Seeking Input: Enhancing Our Candidate SWOT Analysis Report

That's a great point about evidence standardization - we've hit similar walls trying to quantify assessments before nailing down consistent evaluation...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Seeking Input: Enhancing Our Candidate SWOT Analysis Report

The peer benchmarking approach you mentioned is really smart - we've been wrestling with similar consistency issues, especially when different hiring ...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Curious: what’s on your recruiting QC list?

I actually implemented a formal QC checklist after realizing our team was inconsistent on basic verification steps - too many candidates were advancin...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Updated Candidate screen

The categorized dashboard approach definitely addresses a pain point I've wrestled with - getting consistent evaluations across our engineering teams ...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Candidate Comparisson

That's a smart approach - I've had similar experiences where the overall percentage can be misleading for stakeholders who aren't familiar with the te...

2 weeks ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Feature Request: Export Functionality for Candidate Comparisons

This is exactly the bottleneck I've been hitting with technical role screening - the comparison tool gives great insights internally, but translating ...

3 weeks ago