Yes! This is exactly what I'm dealing with too. I'm still pretty new to using Talantly, but I've already hit this wall multiple times when trying to share insights with our partners and managers. Just last week I had to present three candidates for an analyst role and ended up with this frankly embarrassing Word document trying to recreate the comparison data. The worst part is our managing partner specifically asked about the skills breakdown, and I know the radar chart would have answered that perfectly - but instead I'm fumbling through bullet points trying to explain why candidate A is stronger in technical skills while candidate B excels in client communication. It really does feel like we're only getting half the value of the tool when the presentation part falls apart!
This resonates deeply - I've had similar experiences where the visual insights are so clear in the tool, but translating that to executive presentations becomes this whole production. We've actually started scheduling quick screen-sharing sessions with key stakeholders instead of trying to recreate everything in slides, which helps preserve some of that interactive value. The challenge is it doesn't scale well when you need buy-in from multiple people across different time zones. An export feature would definitely streamline our hiring committee discussions and help us maintain consistency in how we present candidate data to leadership.
I completely feel this pain - just last week I was scrambling to put together a presentation for our hiring committee on three fintech candidates, and I ended up with this frankly embarrassing mix of screenshots and bullet points that didn't do justice to the actual comparison data. What's particularly frustrating is that the visual comparison is so much more compelling than trying to explain "Candidate A is stronger in system design but weaker in regulatory knowledge" - the radar chart makes those trade-offs immediately obvious to non-technical stakeholders.
I've started scheduling quick screen-sharing sessions instead of trying to export static materials, which works better for the decision-making conversation but obviously doesn't scale when you need async review. A shareable link feature would be incredible - even something basic where stakeholders could view the comparison without editing access would solve 80% of this workflow headache.
Absolutely feeling this pain! I've been doing the exact same screenshot dance, and it's particularly frustrating when you're trying to justify hiring decisions to finance or exec teams who want concrete data. The radar visualizations are perfect for showing skill alignment at a glance, but when you flatten them into static images, you lose that immediate "aha" moment. I've actually started scheduling more in-person meetings just so I can screen-share the live comparison tool, which defeats the whole efficiency purpose. A shareable link feature would be huge - even something simple where stakeholders could view (not edit) the comparison would save hours and make our recommendations so much more compelling.
I completely get this frustration - I've had to do the same screenshot dance when presenting candidates to our regional directors. The comparison data is solid for my own analysis, but translating that into something executive-friendly without losing the visual impact is definitely a gap. A clean export function would save so much time, especially when you're juggling multiple roles across different business units.
I completely relate to this frustration - just last week I had to present three candidates for a manufacturing supervisor role to our plant manager, and I found myself basically recreating the entire comparison in a Word document. The visual breakdown of technical skills versus leadership experience would have been so much clearer than my makeshift tables. It's particularly challenging when you're dealing with senior stakeholders who want quick, digestible insights but the manual export process ends up taking longer than the actual candidate evaluation.
This resonates with my experience too, especially when presenting to regional leadership across different time zones. The comparison tool has definitely streamlined my initial candidate evaluation process, but I've run into similar export limitations when our APAC hiring managers need to review candidates during their business hours. A shareable link feature would be particularly valuable for our cross-regional collaboration - right now I'm essentially recreating the analysis in different formats for different stakeholders.